Anti-Pro-Life PAC Endorses Fisher, Geren, Cook, Straus and Others

Anti-Pro-Life PAC Endorses Fisher, Geren, Cook, Straus and Others
By
James Scott Trimm

TexPac is the political arm of the Texas Medical Association and is an infamous anti-life PAC, not just protecting abortion, but euthanasia and death panels as well.   (TMA). 

When the famous Pro-Life bill HB 2 was SB 5 (before Wendy Davis Filibustered SB 5 and it was reintroduced as HB 2)  TMA stood strongly against the bill.  Texas Right to Life has documented TMA’a opposition to Pro-Life legislation going back to at least 2003!  Including support of the infamous Texas death panel law.  See "Texas Medical Association Protects Abortionists" on the Texas Right to Life Website for more details.


The Fisher Endorsement

The Fisher endorsement is the most disappointing, but comes as no surprise at this point.  Scott Fisher is a Bedford pastor challenging conservative hero Jonathan Stickland.  Fisher has clearly sold his soul.  The Bedford Pastor has engaged in an unbiblical smear campaign against his fellow Christian opponent <click here> (apparently using information obtained by a known Democrat Operative <click here>).  When campaign financial reports came out it was learned that  the pastor with a pro-life history had received thirty pieces of silver (actually $10,000, more than 10% of Fisher’s total contributions) from TexPac (see more: click here ).  In a recent article analyzing the recent campaign finance reports, the liberal Fort Worth Startle-Gram tried to sell Fisher as a "social conservative" while conveniently omitting the fact that over 10% of his money was coming from anti-pro-life TexPac. Now he is endorsed by TexPac as well.  On the other hand Stickland  is endorsed by Texas Right to Life and has a 100% Pro-Life voting record.


The Geren Endorsement

The endorsement of Charlie Geren comes as no surprise.  Geren recently went through the halls of the capitol, ripping down pro-life signs from the doors of pro-life representatives. Just a few months ago, when Planned Parenthood came to Austin to lobby for money to murder babies in the womb, Pro Life Representative Jonathan Stickland put a sign (supplied by Texas Right to Life) on his office door identifying himself as a former fetus. Geren made the news (Star-Telegram March 11, 2015) when he ripped the sign from Stickland’s door and stormed into his office yelling at Stickland’s staff. 


The Cook Endorsement

Back in May Cook wrote a public letter defending late-term abortions on babies who are diagnosed with a disability.  <Click here> And as Chair of the Texas House State Affairs Committee, Cook has repeatedly used his position to water down and even block pro-life legislation.  More on Cook’s Anti-Pro-Life record is presented by Adam Cahnman.


The Straus Endorsement

In November House Speaker Straus released Interim Charges for the Texas House of Representatives for the 84th Legislature and only included one marginally Pro-Life topic in his charges.  Read More Here: Speaker Straus misses the mark on Pro-Life concerns with Interim Charges for the Texas House


Other Key DFW Endorsements

TexPac is also endorsing Andrew Piel against conservative hero Tony Tinderholt (Dist. 94 Arlington), and Bennett Ratliff against conservative Matt Rinaldi (Dist. 115 Irving) 

In all of these cases TexPac is endorsing Austin Establishment candidates against Pro-Life conservatives. 

Beware of TexPac!

Known Democrat Operative Behind Smear Campaign Against Stickland

Known Democrat Operative Behind Smear Campaign Against Stickland

By

James Scott Trimm

The truth has finally come out.  As you all know the Fisher campaign has engaged in a despicable negative campaign against conservative hero Jonathan Stickland.  I have written in the past about the Austin establishment’s plan to oust Jonathan Stickland <click here> and I have written an open letter from Rabbi Trimm to Scott Fisher concerning his unscriptural mudslinging attacks on his fellow Christian <click here>.

I can now reveal that the ultimate source behind this negative campaign is a known Democrat operative!  I suspected this when this individual began posting excess material on the internet that had not appeared in the press and had not [yet at least] been used by the Fisher campaign.  I kept my theory to myself at the time, but it has now been confirmed.  This Democrat operative could not contain himself and finally blurted out the truth, that he was the ultimate source of the negative information used by the Fisher campaign.

To begin with the Quorum Report broke the “smear campaign” story on Dec. 28th 2015 stating plainly that “The campaign of Scott Fisher, a pastor from North Texas, released to Quorum Report the internet posts…” and later in the day adding “After Stickland today talked about his past drug use, the Fisher campaign wasted little time in unveiling internet posts from 2008…”   So there is no doubt that this story was spoon fed to the media by Scott Fisher’s campaign. 

But now we know that the Fisher campaign obtained the information from a known Democrat operative named Shane Hardin (pictured above with "abortion barbie" Wendy Davis).  In an internet posting today Hardin blurted out the truth:

Who is Shane Hardin?  Hardin is no Republican, and no friend of conservatism.  Shane Hardin was the Democrat challenger to Rep. Matt Krause (Fort Worth) in HD-93’s general election in 2012.  His donors included the Tarrant Democrat Party, the Tarrant Stonewall Democrats, the Mid-City Democrats, the Texas AFL-CIO, the Transport Workers’ Union, the Brotherhood of Local Engineers and Trainmen, Rep. Lon Burnam (Fort Worth), and the former Chair of Tarrant County‘s Democratic Party, Steve Maxwell.

When Hardin ran for School board in 2014 the Texas Score Card wrote:

Hardin is not just a liberal Democrat; he’s notorious for viciously attacking his ideological enemies in a manner consistent with the intolerant, left-wing political wing of the Democrat party.

He’s parroted propaganda that labels conservatives as extreme, racist and intellectually inferior.

(See more at: http://www.empowertexans.com/features/battleground-tx-finds-a-poster-child/#sthash.aZer16Xa.dpufhttp://www.empowertexans.com/features/battleground-tx-finds-a-poster-child/#sthash.aZer16Xa.dpuf )

So ask yourself, why is a Democrat Operative working with the Fisher campaign, and why is a known Democrat operative working so hard to oust Jonathan Stickland and replace him with a Straus recruit?

Jonathan Stickland is the true conservative, with a perfect conservative voting record.  Stickland is the only legislator in the House of Representatives to have a perfect conservative record.  Here are his scores:
 

Young Conservatives of Texas Score: 100

Texas Right to Life Score: 100

Texans for Fiscal Responsibility: 100 A+

 

Even the Dallas Observer wrote:

"Considering Stickland's bona fides, it's hard to see much room for Fisher to attack the state representative from the right." 

(Oct. 2nd 2015)

Do not let Democrat Operatives, Straus and the Austin establishment succeed in their attempt to oust a conservative champion from the Texas House, and replace him with a Straus recruit!  I encourage you to join me in supporting true conservative Jonathan Stickland.

See I Told You So! Stickland’s Challenger Exposed Again

See I Told You So!

Stickland’s Challenger Exposed Again

By

James Scott Trimm

Well a lot has happened in the last three days.  To begin with, financial reports have been released, so now we know where candidates are getting their money.  The infamous Texas Alliance for Life has endorsed Scott Fisher and over 600 supporters showed up to show their support for Jonathan Stickland at his Defend Texas Liberty event in Hurst Texas.

Back in October I told you that the establishment had recruited Fisher to run against Stickland.  In that blog I revealed that A “fake” pro-life organization called “Texas Alliance for Life” (TAL) had received tens of thousands of  dollars from Strous’s Texas Leadership Fund and that Stickland was being challenged by a close associate of TAL director Joe Pojman by the name of Scott Fisher.  <click here>

Fisher Endorsed by Texas Alliance for Life

Fisher has now been officially endorsed by Joe Pojman’s Texas Alliance for Life, an organization which recently declared that euthanasia is “morally legitimate.”  <click here>

Joe Pojman is the Executive Director of Texas Alliance for Life.  The claimed mission of this organization is to “protect innocent human life from conception through natural death through peaceful, legal means.” And there was a time when this organization was true to its mission, but today the organization exists largely to give cover to politicians that are weak on pro-life issues.  While they are a pro-life, or at least anti-abortion group to an extent, they also often fight conservatives on end of life issues.  For example Pojman has empowered the healthcare lobby and hospitals to end the life of a patient without family permission.

In a recent blog I showed how TAL had supported death panels in Texas while Texas Right to Life has been lobbying since 2005 to end these death panels.  When opportunities to reform this act have presented themselves, Pojman’s Texas Alliance for Life has run interference.  For example in the 84th Texas Legislative session (2015) Texas Alliance for Life actually supported House Bill 2351, which was supposed to be a bill to reform these death panels, but in reality this Bill only perpetuated the death panels. <click here for more> 

This is the very Death Panel Law that was invoked by Houston Methodist Hospital in their recent efforts to let Chris Dunn die.  <click here> 

And recently Pojman’s Texas Alliance for Life spoke out in support of the Hospital in the Chris Dunn matter, spoke in support of death panels, and even declared euthanasia to be morally legitimate!  < click here>

TAL has also endorsed Byron Cook.  While Pojman was inside Cook’s campaign kick off event declaring Cook to be Pro-Life, real pro-life protesters were outside protesting his deplorable pro-life record.  In fact Cook wrote a public letter defending late-term abortions on babies who are diagnosed with a disability! <click here> 

TAL also gave an award to Charlie Geren for his courage as a pro-life hero at last years TAL banquet for his “Courageous Defense of Life”.  State Representative Charlie Geren recently (when Planned Parenthood came to Austin to lobby for money to murder babies in the womb) went through the halls of the capitol, ripping down pro-life signs from the doors of real pro-life representatives.  Stickland put a sign (supplied by Texas Right to Life) on his office door identifying himself as a “former fetus”. This drew the anger of the Austin establishment and Straus lieutenant Charlie Geren made the news (Star-Telegram March 11, 2015) when he ripped the sign from Stickland’s door and stormed into his office yelling at Stickland’s staff.

Fisher’s Biggest Contributor is TEXPAC

Fisher’s largest single contributor was TexPac.  TexPac is the political arm of the Texas Medical Association (TMA).  TexPac donated $10,000, more than 10% of Fisher’s total support!  Let me tell you, TexPac money is NOT pro-life money!  

When the famous Pro-Life bill HB 2 was SB 5 (before Wendy Davis Filibustered SB 5 and it was reintroduced as HB 2)  TMA stood strongly against SB 5/ HB 2 and called it a “legislative intrusion into the patient-physician relationship” that “sets a dangerous precedent of the legislature prescribing the details of the practice of medicine.”

Texas Right to Life has documented TMA’a opposition to Pro-Life legislation going back to at least 2003!  Including support of the infamous Texas death panel law.  <click here>  

Fisher CLAIMS to be the Pro-Life candidate, but he is endorsed by a “fake” pro-life organization that calls euthanasia “morally legitimate" and his largest contributor by far is anti-pro-life TEXPAC.  

Jonathan Stickland is the true Pro-Life candidate.  It is Jonathan Stickland who is endorsed by the Texas Right to Life!  

  

This weekend over 600 supporters showed up to support Jonathan Stickland at his Defend Texas Freedom event. (Eat your heart out Byron Cook) We are sticking with Stickland! 

Stickland Challenger Pushes the Bamboozle Envelope

 

Stickland Challenger Pushes the Bamboozle Envelope

By

James Scott Trimm

In a recent blog I demonstrated that Fisher was attempting to “bamboozle” voters with his recent Facebook ads and web page <click here>.

Now Fisher has really pushed the “bamboozle” envelope.  In recent days the Scott Fisher campaign has been pouring money into Facebook ads asking users to “like” Fisher if they want a secure boarder. 

But now Fisher has announced that he has been endorsed by the Texas Association of Business (TAB) -- Business and Commerce Political Action Committee (BACPAC)!

In the video below is TAB's President Bill Hammond is speaking at a liberal Democrat rally in Austin against Jonathan Stickland’s bill HB 209 which would have repealed in state college tuition for illegals in Texas (Rick Perry’s “Dream Act”)!

Asked why TAB BACPAC had endorsed Stickland’s opponent, Stickand said:

“The reason is simple, they worked against our efforts to ban sanctuary cities, against protecting traditional marriage, and argued to keep in state college tuition for illegals. Obviously I am their worst nightmare.”

Amazingly Scott Fisher thinks that the voters are so stupid, that he can claim to be a champion for securing the border while at the same time announcing that he is proud be endorsed by TAB BACPAC!

Don't be bamboozled by misleading ads!

Jonathan Stickland is the true conservative, with a perfect conservative voting record.  Stickland is the only legislator in the House of Representatives to have a perfect conservative record.  Here are his scores:
 
Young Conservatives of Texas Score: 100

Texas Right to Life Score: 100

Texans for Fiscal Responsibility: 100 A+

 

Even the Dallas Observer wrote:

"Considering Stickland's bona fides, it's hard to see much room for Fisher to attack the state representative from the right." 

(Oct. 2nd 2015)

Do not let Straus and the Austin establishment succeed in their attempt to oust a conservative champion from the Texas House, and replace him with a Straus recruit!  I encourage you to join me in supporting true conservative Jonathan Stickland.

Joe Pojman’s TAL Declares Euthanasia "Morally Legitimate"

Joe Pojman’s TAL Declares Euthanasia "Morally Legitimate"

By

James Scott Trimm

In defending their silence on the Pro-Life issue of the life of Chris Dunn, Joe Pojman's Texas Alliance for Life (TAL) has finally spoken.  On their Facebook page TAL wrote:

Many pro-life individuals have been gravely concerned about the tragic case of Mr. Chris Dunn, a 46-year-old man who was admitted into a Houston hospital in mid-October and was on a ventilator. Some media accounts and a pro-life organization misrepresented the situation as one in which the hospital intended to kill Mr. Dunn by removing the respirator that was considered necessary to sustain Mr. Dunn's life. The claims were made that the hospital had judged that Mr. Dunn's life was not worth living….

To help correct the record and to explain the ethical issues involved with end-of-life care, Dr. Beverly Nuckols, a family physician and board member of Texas Alliance for Life, and Deirdre Cooper, our public policy analyst, authored the following article on Public Discourse. We highly recommend every pro-lifer reads it [sic].

In defending Methodist Hospital’s Death Panel’s decision to discontinue life-sustaining treatment from Chris Dunn, Nuckols and Cooper wrote:

"It is entirely possible, even plausible, that the doctors—and Dunn’s father, in his role as surrogate—could have understood Dunn’s death as an unintended but foreseen side effect of a morally legitimate object. That object, by their own profession, was to stop the suffering caused by the treatment to sustain his life."

(Balancing the Rights of Patients andDoctors: Another Perspective on a Tragic Case; by  Deirdre Cooper and Beverly Nuckols )

That’s right, a TAL board member and the TAL public policy analyst just declared that "to stop the sufferuing caused by ... treatment to sustain ... life" is "a morally legitimate object."!  

In my recent blog The Establishment’s Plan to Oust Jonathan Stickland I wrote:

Joe Pojman is the Executive Director of Texas Alliance for Life.  The claimed mission of this organization is to “protect innocent human life from conception through natural death through peaceful, legal means.” And there was a time when this organization was true to its mission, but today the organization exists largely to give cover to politicians that are weak on pro-life issues.  While they are a pro-life, or at least anti-abortion group to an extent, they also often fight conservatives on end of life issues.  For example Pojman has empowered the healthcare lobby and hospitals to end the life of a patient without family permission.

Little did I know that just about a month later the issue of TAL's less than Pro-Life position on end of life care was about to become front and center with the efforts by the Houston Methodist Hospital death panel to let Chris Dunn die! <click here for more on this>

Back 1999, The Texas Legislature unanimously passed the draconian Texas Advance Directives Act (TADA). Under TADA, when a doctor and a patient (or his/her surrogate) disagree about appropriate end-of-life treatment, the disagreement is taken before an ethics review committee.

TADA only provides a ten day period for the patient's family either to find another facility to accept the patient or to obtain a court injunction to extend their life. If no other facility will accept the patient within the period of time and the family is unable to obtain a court injunction, then the hospital is legally permitted to withdraw life sustaining-treatment from the patient, and simply let them die, regardless of their wishes, their living will, or the wishes of their family.  Folks, this is one of those “death panels” about you have been warned. 

Texas Right to Life has been lobbying since 2005 has to end these death panels.  You would think that any real pro-life organization, would be working with them to end this “death panel” system in Texas.  But that is far from the truth.  When opportunities to reform this act have presented themselves, Pojman’s Texas Alliance for Life has run interference.  For example in the 84^th Texas Legislative session (2015) Texas Alliance for Life actually supported House Bill 2351, which was supposed to be a bill to reform these death panels, but in reality this Bill only perpetuated the death panels.  

Texas Right to Life wrote about this bill (Which Pojman and TAL supported):

HB 2351 by Representative Patricia Harless (R-Spring) will also be heard today in the House Committee on State Affairs.  The stated purpose of HB 2351 is to reform hospital ethics committees (death panels), which currently hold unlimited power to remove medical treatment from patients after providing ten days notice to the patient or family.  Under the current Texas Advance Directives Act, hospitals may remove life-sustaining treatments including a ventilator, dialysis, food, and hydration from patients, even if the patient or their family has expressed a desire to continue such care and treatment.  Treatment can be withdrawn from any patient for any reason, including discrimination against a patient who is elderly, terminally ill, or disabled.

Rather than actually reforming the draconian ten-day law, HB 2351 instructs the hospital committees to write and circulate their own regulations about conflicts of interest for their own ethics committees about their own decisions on withdrawing treatment from patients.  HB 2351 also instructs facilities to write and implement policies for withdrawing treatment from patients with disabilities.  However, this section establishes yet another dangerous loophole through this provision by adding: “unless the disability is relevant in determining whether a medical or surgical intervention is medically appropriate.”  HB 2351 does not actually provide specific details about what the policies should be, just that hospitals should adopt policies on these topics.

 (Committee to hear dangerous bills masquerading as Pro-Life, April 8, 2015)

 

Thanks to Joe Pojman and the Texas Alliance for Life, death panels are alive and well in Texas.  There is blood on their hands.

If you want to support the pro-life movement in Texas, please do it through Texas Right to Life, do not be fooled by groups who have sold their souls to the Austin Establishment and the healthcare lobby. 

Stickland Challenger Seeks to Bamboozle Voters

Stickland Challenger Seeks to Bamboozle Voters

By

James Scott Trimm

The race for House District 92 has become the centerpiece if Texas politics in the 2016 election, with Stickand becoming the target of a despicable negative campaign by his opposition. I recently wrote an open letter to Fisher about this negative campaign.

As I told you back in October, this year Jonathan Stickland is the establishment’s top target and his primary challenger has clearly been hand-picked by the Austin establishment.   It should come as no surprise that the establishment has pulled out all the stops and that even an ex-governor hasbeen pulled in to support Stickland’s challenger.  Why would an ex-governor care about a local State Representative race?  Because Jonathan Stickland has been a “stick” in the eye of the Austin Establishment. 

Stickland is to the Texas House what Ted Cruz in to the US Senate. He has become the Maverick of the Texas Legislature.  And sometimes he has represented us by being a voice on the microphone in the back of the House, telling it like it is!  The Dallas Observer has even reported:

Stickland aggravated House Speaker Joe Strauss (sic) and his allies so badly that at least two legislators saw Strauss (sic) ally Charlie Geren dangle a cookie on a string in front Strickland in a mocking attempt to lead him away from one of his frequent back-microphone stem-winders.

(Dallas Observer; Oct. 2nd 2015)

Personally I thank the Almighty that our District has a voice telling it like it is on the back-microphone in the House!  And because Stickland has stood up so strong against the establishment for conservative principles like limited government and personal freedom, the Austin establishment wants Stickland replaced, and they are determined to get rid of him.

Most recently Fisher has been running a series of sponsored Facebook advertisements encouraging members to “like” Fisher’s campaign website if they want to secure the border, or if they want to support the second amendment.  The following are screen captures of the actual advertisements:

The nature of these misleading advertisements implies that voters need to support Fisher based on the false premise Stickland does not support securing the border and does not support the second amendment.  Nothing could be further from the truth!  To the contrary, Stickland is one of the leading champions in the Texas House on both issues! 

One might think, from these misleading Facebook advertisements that a vote for Fisher is a vote to eliminate a threat to the second amendment.  This is a complete misrepresentation!  It is Stickland, not Fisher who is endorsed by the NRA in this race.  It is also Stickland  not Fisher who is endorsed by the National Association for Gun Rights.  [Editorial addition 1/13/16 Stickland is now also endorsed by the Texas State Rifle Association PAC.]

Fisher's website claims "Because of Scott’s commitment to the 2nd Amendment, he has been given an “A” Rating by the National Rifle Association and the Texas State Rifle Association." but what he does not tell you is that it is Stickland who has the actual endorsement of both organizations, and not just based only on "commitment" but based more importantly upon a proven record in the House!

In fact Stickland was a leading voice for Constitutional Carry during the 84^th legislature.  The following video showcases his support for second amendments in the House:

In the above video Stickland is seeking to offer an amendment that would have established Constitutional Carry in Texas.  It is Fisher's Austin Establishment recruiters who are shutting him down without even allowing a public discussion!  Yet Fisher presents himself over Stickland as the gun rights candidate!

Fisher is seeking to bamboozle voters!  Do not be fooled! 

Jonathan Stickland is the true conservative, with a perfect conservative voting record.  Stickland is the only legislator in the House of Representatives to have a perfect conservative record.  Here are his scores:
 

Young Conservatives of Texas Score: 100

Texas Right to Life Score: 100

Texans for Fiscal Responsibility: 100 A+

 

Even the Dallas Observer wrote:

"Considering Stickland's bona fides, it's hard to see much room for Fisher to attack the state representative from the right." 

(Oct. 2nd 2015)

Do not let Straus and the Austin establishment succeed in their attempt to oust a conservative champion from the Texas House, and replace him with a Straus recruit!  I encourage you to join me in supporting true conservative Jonathan Stickland.

The Infamous Rape Bill: Why HB 189 Was Bad Law

The Infamous Rape Bill:
Why HB 189 Was Bad Law
By
James Scott Trimm

Representatives Matt Rinaldi, Matt Schaefer, Jonathan Stickland, Tony Tinderholt, and Cecil Bell all voted against House Bill 189.  Stickland’s primary challenger Scott Fisher has paraded this vote before the press saying “I don’t know how he justifies it.” 

Well the fact that Fisher does not understand why someone would vote against this bill, demonstrates his lack of qualification to serve as a State Representative.  It would be one thing if Fisher understood Stickland’s vote but disagreed, but it is quite another thing that Fisher does not even understand the issues involved and does not know why those that voted against the bill voted “nay”.

Rape is certainly a horrific crime, on one debates that.  Unfortunately it is a crime that by its very nature rarely has direct witnesses and often has little or no evidence.  The one thing that characterizes rape is lack of consent, but is many cases, lack of consent can break down into a “he said” vs. “she said” quandary in which the accusation alone can become the basis for a conviction. 

So now we come to HB 189.  The problem is that HB 189 eliminated due process protections that previously existed in sexual assault cases where there is no physical evidence and greatly increases the chance that innocent people will be convicted based on false accusations.

There was already no statute of limitations for rape cases involving children or where there is DNA evidence, one of the strictest in the nation. 

This bill (authored by Houston Democrat Senfronia Thompson)  removed the ten year statute of limitations on certain rape cases where there is no physical evidence, creating a high risk of someone wrongfully accused being unable to defend themselves from accusations thirty or forty years after the occurrence based on witness testimony alone.

There is a reason for the statutes of limitations.  A defendant has a right to defend himself, however that ability often degrades with the passage of time.  Documents are lost and destroyed, memories are less clear, and witnesses die. 

Does Fisher not understand the importance and value of the statutes of limitations in protecting innocent men from false accusations?  Does Fisher not understand why one would not want innocent men being wrongly sent to prison?
I am saddened that we have “Republicans” who will attack them taking a page from the Democrat playbook implying falsely that this vote was indicative of some kind of “war on women”. And I for one am glad that we have courageous men in the House who will vote against unjust legislation. 

The Personal Testimony of Jonathan Stickland

The Personal Testimony of Jonathan Stickland

Thru his website Jonathan Stickland has issued the following response to the despicable negative campaign launched by his challenger Scott Fisher:

I am a Sinner Saved B by Grace

I talked with Scott Fisher days after he announced his campaign and we both agreed to run very positive campaigns, focused on our differences on the issues. It’s clear he never had any intention of keeping his word, and it is disappointing that he would chose to attack me and my family three days after Christmas.

Anyone who knows my testimony, my family, friends, and many supporters, are aware that I smoked marijuana regularly in high school and my early collegiate years. Let me even go a step further and say throughout my teens and twenties I have said and done things I wish I hadn’t. But by the Grace of God my past sins are forgiven.

Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush and I have all smoked marijuana. I never grew marijuana. But I hope and pray that my daughters never make the mistake I made, and that, if they do fail, they know of the forgiveness readily available.

Scott Fisher knows that I represent the Christian conservative values of my constituents, so he has instead decided to focus on a post I made at 17 years old, and mistakes I made in my teens and twenties. It’s disappointing that politics has gotten to this point where even a pastor will stoop this low.

Every campaign I have run has focused on the issues, but if Mr. Fisher wants to make this campaign about my personal testimony, we can do that too.

So now my own comments:

 

Jonathan has said this well.  

 

Last week I posted an Open Letter from Rabbi Trimm to Pastor Fishjer Concerning Evil Speech

The reason Stickland’s challenger is resorting to mud slinging is that he cannot win by campaigning on conservative issues.  Stickland is the only legislator in the House of Representatives to have a perfect conservative record.  Here are his scores:

Young Conservatives of Texas Score: 100

Texas Right to Life Score: 100

Texans for Fiscal Responsibility: 100 A+

Even the Dallas Observer wrote:

"Considering Stickland's bona fides, it's hard to see much room for Fisher to attack the state representative from the right." 

(Oct. 2nd 2015)

 

I issued a warning months about the Austin Establishment’s plan to oust Jonathan Stickland.  Back in October I uncovered a trail of money from the Straus Establishment to Joe Pojman and the Texas Alliance for Life (a “fake” pro-life group) and the close relationship between Pojman and Fisher.  Read the updated version of that blog by clicking here.  At the end of that most recent update, we warned you that Stickland’s challenger would soon be pouring thousands of dollars into a despicable negative campaign. Well now that has happened.

Do not let Straus and the Austin establishment succeed in their attempt to oust a conservative champion from the Texas House, and replace him with a Straus recruit!  I encourage you to join me in supporting true conservative Jonathan Stickland.

Austin Establishment: Tea Partist Precinct Chairs in District 92 Must Go!

Austin Establishment:

Tea Partist Precinct Chairs in District 92 Must Go!

By

James Scott Trimm

I have been telling you for months about the Austin Establishment’s plan to oust Jonathan Stickland.  Back in October I uncovered a trail of money from the Straus Establishment to Joe Pojman and the Texas Alliance for Life (a “fake” pro-life group) and the close relationship between Pojman and Stickland’s primary challenger Scott Fisher.  Read the updated version of that blog by clicking here.  At the end of that most recent update, we warned you that Stickland’s challenger would soon be pouring thousands of dollars into a despicable negative campaign.  

(We also recently revealed that Government funded Lobbyists are openly supporting Stickland's challenger, hoping to replace him with an establishment friendly Straus recruit)

Last week I posted an Open Letter from Rabbi Trimm to Pastor Fishjer Concerning Evil Speech

The reason Stickland’s challenger is resorting to mud slinging is that he cannot win by campaigning on conservative issues.  Stickland is the only legislator in the House of Representatives to have a perfect conservative record.  Here are his scores:

Young Conservatives of Texas Score: 100

Texas Right to Life Score: 100

Texans for Fiscal Responsibility: 100 A+

Even the Dallas Observer wrote:

"Considering Stickland's bona fides, it's hard to see much room for Fisher to attack the state representative from the right." 

(Oct. 2nd 2015)

Now Fisher’s Establishment friendly supporters are openly admitting that they are trying to “take back” District 92 from “Tea Partists”.  They have also stated their intent to oust the “Tea Partist” Precinct Chairs in District 92 who have come out in Support of Stickland.  (28 Precinct Chairs in District 92, including myself, have endorsed Jonathan Stickland).  The following was posted today on Scott Fisher’s campaign Facebook page:

For the record, not all of the 28 Precinct Chairs that have endorsed Stickland are "Tea Partists".

The blog you are reading right now is written by a Precinct Chair in District 92 and clearly has been a thorn in the side of Fisher and his Establishment friends' plan to “take back” district 92 from true Conservative “Tea Partists”.  They have now declared war on the NE Tarrant County Tea Party!