Joe Pojman’s TAL Declares Euthanasia
"Morally Legitimate"
By
James Scott Trimm
In defending their silence on the Pro-Life issue of the life of Chris Dunn,
Joe Pojman's Texas Alliance for Life (TAL) has finally spoken. On their
Facebook page TAL wrote:
Many pro-life individuals have been gravely
concerned about the tragic case of Mr. Chris Dunn, a 46-year-old man who was
admitted into a Houston hospital in mid-October and was on a ventilator. Some
media accounts and a pro-life organization misrepresented the situation as one
in which the hospital intended to kill Mr. Dunn by removing the respirator that
was considered necessary to sustain Mr. Dunn's life. The claims were made that
the hospital had judged that Mr. Dunn's life was not worth living….
To help correct the record and to explain
the ethical issues involved with end-of-life care, Dr. Beverly Nuckols, a
family physician and board member of Texas Alliance for Life, and Deirdre
Cooper, our public policy analyst, authored the following article on Public
Discourse. We highly recommend every pro-lifer reads it [sic].
In defending Methodist Hospital’s Death
Panel’s decision to discontinue life-sustaining treatment from Chris Dunn, Nuckols
and Cooper wrote:
"It is entirely possible, even
plausible, that the doctors—and Dunn’s father, in his role as surrogate—could
have understood Dunn’s death as an unintended but foreseen side effect of a
morally legitimate object. That object, by their own profession, was to stop
the suffering caused by the treatment to sustain his life."
(Balancing the Rights of Patients andDoctors: Another Perspective on a Tragic Case; by Deirdre Cooper and Beverly Nuckols )
In my recent blog The Establishment’s Plan to Oust Jonathan Stickland I wrote:
Joe Pojman is the Executive Director of Texas Alliance for
Life. The claimed mission of this
organization is to “protect innocent human life from conception through natural
death through peaceful, legal means.” And there was a time when this
organization was true to its mission, but today the organization exists largely
to give cover to politicians that are weak on pro-life issues. While they are a pro-life, or at least anti-abortion
group to an extent, they also often fight conservatives on end of life
issues. For example Pojman has
empowered the healthcare lobby and hospitals to end the life of a patient
without family permission.
Little did I know that just about a month later the issue of TAL's less than Pro-Life position on end of life care was about to become front and center with the efforts by the Houston Methodist Hospital death panel to let Chris Dunn die! <click here for more on this>
Back 1999, The Texas Legislature unanimously passed the
draconian Texas Advance Directives Act (TADA). Under TADA, when a doctor and a
patient (or his/her surrogate) disagree about appropriate end-of-life
treatment, the disagreement is taken before an ethics review committee.
TADA only provides a ten day period for the patient's family
either to find another facility to accept the patient or to obtain a court
injunction to extend their life. If no other facility will accept the patient
within the period of time and the family is unable to obtain a court
injunction, then the hospital is legally permitted to withdraw life
sustaining-treatment from the patient, and simply let them die, regardless of
their wishes, their living will, or the wishes of their family. Folks, this is one of those “death panels”
about you have been warned.
Texas Right to Life has been lobbying since 2005 has to end
these death panels. You would think
that any real pro-life organization, would be working with them to end this
“death panel” system in Texas. But that
is far from the truth. When
opportunities to reform this act have presented themselves, Pojman’s Texas
Alliance for Life has run interference.
For example in the 84th Texas Legislative session (2015)
Texas Alliance for Life actually supported House Bill 2351, which was supposed
to be a bill to reform these death panels, but in reality this Bill only
perpetuated the death panels.
Texas Right to Life wrote about this bill (Which Pojman and
TAL supported):
HB 2351 by Representative Patricia Harless (R-Spring) will
also be heard today in the House Committee on State Affairs. The stated purpose of HB 2351 is to reform
hospital ethics committees (death panels), which currently hold unlimited power
to remove medical treatment from patients after providing ten days notice to
the patient or family. Under the
current Texas Advance Directives Act, hospitals may remove life-sustaining
treatments including a ventilator, dialysis, food, and hydration from patients,
even if the patient or their family has expressed a desire to continue such
care and treatment. Treatment can be
withdrawn from any patient for any reason, including discrimination against a patient
who is elderly, terminally ill, or disabled.
Rather than actually reforming the draconian ten-day law, HB
2351 instructs the hospital committees to write and circulate their own
regulations about conflicts of interest for their own ethics committees about
their own decisions on withdrawing treatment from patients. HB 2351 also instructs facilities to write
and implement policies for withdrawing treatment from patients with
disabilities. However, this section
establishes yet another dangerous loophole through this provision by adding: “unless
the disability is relevant in determining whether a medical or surgical
intervention is medically appropriate.”
HB 2351 does not actually provide specific details about what the
policies should be, just that hospitals should adopt policies on these topics.
(Committee to hear dangerous bills masquerading as Pro-Life, April 8, 2015)
Thanks to Joe Pojman and the Texas Alliance for Life, death
panels are alive and well in Texas.
There is blood on their hands.
No comments:
Post a Comment