By
James Scott Trimm
In June of 2016 SCOTUS overturned large portions of Texas'
anti-abortion omnibus law (HB 2).
The majority 5-3 ruling strikes down two provisions of House Bill 2, the Pro-Life Omnibus Bill of the 2013 Legislative Session, which require abortion mills to operate as Ambulatory Surgical Centers and which require abortionists to possess hospital admitting privileges within a 30-mile radius of the abortion mill before committing abortions.
The provision in the law which protects preborn children -- who science shows feel pain at 20 weeks -- was not challenged and continues to save lives in Texas.
This ruling comes, despite the fact that no branch of the federal government has delegated power under the US Constitution, over the regulation of safety of medical procedures or facilities, or over the licensing of medical personal or facilities. Therefore, under the tenth amendment these powers are retained by the states.
The supposed "right to an abortion" is not found in the US Constitution and is an invention of SCOTUS. The right to life, however, is guaranteed by the ninth amendment which must certainly encompass the the inalienable rights of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" referenced in the Declaration of Independence., and the 14th amendment which states that no state can "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This right must extend to the unborn because the Preamble of the US Constitution states ""We the People of the United States, in Order to... secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." By definition "our Posterity" are the unborn, so all Constitutional protections must apply to the unborn.
It is time for Texas to demand our Tenth Amendment rights!
The majority 5-3 ruling strikes down two provisions of House Bill 2, the Pro-Life Omnibus Bill of the 2013 Legislative Session, which require abortion mills to operate as Ambulatory Surgical Centers and which require abortionists to possess hospital admitting privileges within a 30-mile radius of the abortion mill before committing abortions.
The provision in the law which protects preborn children -- who science shows feel pain at 20 weeks -- was not challenged and continues to save lives in Texas.
This ruling comes, despite the fact that no branch of the federal government has delegated power under the US Constitution, over the regulation of safety of medical procedures or facilities, or over the licensing of medical personal or facilities. Therefore, under the tenth amendment these powers are retained by the states.
The supposed "right to an abortion" is not found in the US Constitution and is an invention of SCOTUS. The right to life, however, is guaranteed by the ninth amendment which must certainly encompass the the inalienable rights of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" referenced in the Declaration of Independence., and the 14th amendment which states that no state can "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." This right must extend to the unborn because the Preamble of the US Constitution states ""We the People of the United States, in Order to... secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." By definition "our Posterity" are the unborn, so all Constitutional protections must apply to the unborn.
It is time for Texas to demand our Tenth Amendment rights!
The Texas State Republican Platform for
2016 boldly proclaims concerning abortion:
"Abolish Abortion- We call upon the
Texas Legislature to enact legislation stopping the murder of unborn children;
and to ignore and refuse to enforce any and all federal statutes, regulations,
executive orders, and court rulings, which would deprive an unborn child of the
right to life."
But how can the Texas Legislature enact
legislation abolishing abortion in Texas?
What about Roe v. Wade? Hasn’t
the US Supreme Court ruled that there is a Constitutional right to an abortion? What about today's ruling?
Well as the platform says, there is a way
for Texas to “to ignore and refuse to enforce any and all federal statutes,
regulations, executive orders, and court rulings, which would deprive an unborn
child of the right to life.” That way
involves reclaiming our Texas Sovereignty, as the Platform elsewhere states:
State Sovereignty- Pursuant to Article 1
Section 1 of the Texas Constitution, the federal government has impaired our
right of local self-government.
Therefore, federally mandated legislation, which infringes upon the 10th
Amendment rights of Texas, should be ignored, opposed, refused, and nullified.
Regulation of Commerce in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution has exceeded
the original intent. All attempts by the federal judiciary to rule in areas not
expressly enumerated by the Untied States Constitution should be likewise
nullified. Any federal enforcement activities that do occur in Texas should be
conducted under the authority of the county sheriff.
This week Texas State Representative Tony Tinderholt filed a bill (HB 948) in the Texas House that would follow these directives to end abortion in Texas!
The Supreme Court has become the final
interpreter of the Constitution for one simple reason: because they say they
are. The Supreme Court usurped this
authority, claiming it for itself in 1803 in Marbury v. Madison. Nowhere does the Constitution assign this
role to the Supreme Court, they simply have it because they say they do.
The framers stated that the US Constitution
is a compact between the member states, and that as such, each state has equal
standing in determining for itself the meaning of the Constitution. The tenth amendment states that the states
and the people retain all powers not delegated to the federal government in the
Constitution, and nowhere in the Constitution did the states delegate to any
branch of the federal government the power to be the ultimate and final
interpreter of the Constitution. The
Supremacy Clause never mentions the Supreme court, but appears to indicate that
state judges would make these judgments.(You can read more about this by clicking here)
Surely any law our state passes that reclaims its
sovereignty will be declared unconstitutional by the federal government, since
they have developed their own precedence on the issue. This has been called the Goliad approach to
sovereignty. You surrender to the
authority you were fighting, ask for mercy and are slaughtered in return.
HB 948 clarifies in the Texas Family Code that personhood and the rights that go along with it begin at fertilization, not birth, and removes contrary definitions throughout Texas statutes. This bill also removes the exemptions from the Penal Code for murder if the person committing the offense is the mother of an unborn child or a physician if the death of the child is the intended result.
Most importantly HB 948 requires that the Texas Attorney General and local governments enforce this law in Texas regardless of any federal action or court rulings, and prohibits the State of Texas from legitimizing any federal court proceedings by making any appearances related to this law in Federal court.
This means the federal courts will also have no power to find HB 948 unconstitutional, because the law itself takes that decision out of their hands.
This is the only way to end abortion in Texas. Any effort that leaves the matter ultimately in the hands of federal courts will fail, because they will simply declare it unconstitutional (though their own usurped power to do so is itself unconstitutional).
Yes we can nullify Roe v. Wade in Texas! We must urge Texas Legislature to pass HB 948.
HB 948 clarifies in the Texas Family Code that personhood and the rights that go along with it begin at fertilization, not birth, and removes contrary definitions throughout Texas statutes. This bill also removes the exemptions from the Penal Code for murder if the person committing the offense is the mother of an unborn child or a physician if the death of the child is the intended result.
Most importantly HB 948 requires that the Texas Attorney General and local governments enforce this law in Texas regardless of any federal action or court rulings, and prohibits the State of Texas from legitimizing any federal court proceedings by making any appearances related to this law in Federal court.
This means the federal courts will also have no power to find HB 948 unconstitutional, because the law itself takes that decision out of their hands.
This is the only way to end abortion in Texas. Any effort that leaves the matter ultimately in the hands of federal courts will fail, because they will simply declare it unconstitutional (though their own usurped power to do so is itself unconstitutional).
Yes we can nullify Roe v. Wade in Texas! We must urge Texas Legislature to pass HB 948.
This is how we can finally end abortion in Texas! Remember Goliad!
Thank you Texas State Representative Tony Tinderholt for having the courage to file this landmark bill!
Thank you Texas State Representative Tony Tinderholt for having the courage to file this landmark bill!
Thanks be to God. Finally in Texas, we are leading the way. As is ans as usual.I have been hoping that this would happen in my lifetime or at least in my 24 yr. old daughter.For if the black witch would have won,and to be sure, Ruth Bader Ginsberg would have made forced abortions at practice common for all of our daughter! Thank God, Texas' first president, General Sam Houston said and who rightly said that TEXAS HAS NEVER LEARNED SUBMISSION! And you can take that back to the states.When they asked if Lt.Governor Dan Patrick was worried over the money they would lose federal funding. Patrick laughed at that and said we are the 5th largest economy in the world, well the fifth that is, and he laughed at that that and we both agreed,Texas is,NOT in need of moneth
ReplyDelete